« Product: "Orton-Gillingham Phonics on CD-Rom" | Main | Raising the Bar for California High School Students »
Saturday, July 03, 2004
Product: "Dyslexia Institutes of America"
This one hasn't been advertising in the sponsored links, but I wanted to address what they offer, since they seem to have a business plan a little similar to the BrightStar program. [Editorial clarification: The BrightStar business plan seems to be franchising the machine in stand-alone centers]
Dyslexic Institutes of America offers a model wherein clients come in, are tested using proprietary tests, and then are offered "therapy" based on the diagnostic testing. Treatment is for two hours, once per week, plus drills to be practiced at home. After the first half-year of therapy (48 hours) the "cognitive" part is lessened and more language skills are added.
[Editorial clarification: Les Fredette (who is the president of DIA in Glastonbury, CT) says that the tests are not proprietary.
The test battery used by Dyslexia Institutes of America is designed to detect dyslexia as well as to test current functioning levels in basic reading and cognitive functioning skills. Depending on his or her age, eac client is assesed using the Dyslexia Determination Test, the Adult Dyslexia Test, the Dyslexia Screener for First Graders, the Pre-dyslexia Letter Coding Test, the Dyslexia Early Screening Test, and/or the Analysis of Dyseidesia and Dysphonesia. In addition, some or all subtests from the following nationally normed standardized tests are used:
Would I buy this product for my child Not unless it was the only alternative available. The half year of "cognitive" improvements (which aren't described or evaluated in any way) just let the child slip farther behind. I also have doubts about how well a barely-trained franchisee or "tutor" can help a child with dyslexia.
There are more details to follow.
The services provided are closely tied to one for-profit (franchises available) remediation organization, The Dyslexia Institutes of America.
You can find franchising details here for The Dyslexia Institutes of America. You can purchase a franchise for $54,000.00--other startup costs will apply. (Note--there are a number of franchise tutoring and remedial education opportunities.)
This is not to say that the program offered at the Dyslexia Institutes isn’t good, or effective. It may be. They don't seem to publish data on remediation and improvement. One thing that makes me a little uneasy about the DI approach is that they use Boder's typology (from 1973) which has pretty much been abandoned as diagnostic categories, except among developmental optometrists.
(A sidelight on science: the citation is Boder, E. (1973). Developmental dyslexia: A diagnostic approach based on three atypical reading and spelling patterns. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 15, 663-687. While Boder is still widely cited, efforts to use the typololgy effectively haven't been successful. (More information here
Note that the applicant has to have a specific diagnosed disability, that the testing techniques must be described in detail, and the applicant has to provide the professional credentials of the evaluator, including information about license or certification and area of specialization.
Also please note that the franchising page for the Dyslexia Institutes reads “You do not need highly specialized training and are not required to diagnose or prescribe treatment for your clients. Each Clinic simply have on staff a director, either full or part time who is a certified teacher. perferably with experience in Special Education. As your service provider, we will prepare all client assessment results and therapy prescriptions for you. Your clinic will interview and test new clients, and administer and monitor their ongoing treatments.”
Judging by how strict the CB has been with reputable independent schools, parents who rely on the Dyslexia Institutes testing for accommodations for their children may be sadly disappointed.
The following is a review of the Dyslexia Institutes of America program from woman who is a parent, a Lindamood Bell teacher, and an Orton Gillingham instructor:
I investigated DIA when one opened in my neighborhood. Since I am trained in Orton-Gillingham multisensory procedures for teaching reading to dyslexics, I wanted to see if they use any "recognized" and recommended procedures. I first talked directly to Dr. Jett the founder of the program. She said the facilities spend 24 weeks (nearly six months) on cognitive development (improving the brain's ability to think). Then they do reading remediation activities. The students spend 2 hours, one day a week at the center, and receive homework for the parents to do with them.
The instructional set-up is 2 students with one tutor. When the tutor works individually with 1 student, the other student works on a computer. So you are only getting 1 hour of actual 1-on-1 instruction. I asked her what they did for the kinethetic/tactile part of the procedure, and I was not happy with what she considered a multisensory approach. There is a "whole word" activity which uses the Bell & Howell Language Master where cards are passed through the machine and the word is read to the student. The student then says the word and writes it in the air. Whole word instruction is not beneficial to dyslexics (or they would have learned to read in school since the majority of schools have been using whole word instruction for the last 20 years.)
Dr. Jett got her reading education from the University of Illinois under Dolores Durkin (I have Dr. Durkin's textbook, and it doesn't even mention dyslexia.) Dr Jett developed the reading programs used by the Sylvan Learning Systems. But has only been involved with dyslexia for that past seven years. She told a friend of mine that
O-G and Lindamood-Bell don't work because they don't have this cognitive instruction. But over the last 12 years I have seen great
success with O-G, and my friend's son made terrific progress with Lindamood-Bell.
After talking with Dr. Jett, I talked with the director of the local center; and found that she is not very knowledgable about teaching reading to dyslexics. I asked her what the center does to teach syllabication of words (where long words should be divided--this determines what sound the single vowel has), and she didn't know what I was talking about. She said she hadn't done very well in her English classes. When I explained what I was talking about, she said that they hadn't gotten to that far in the book yet! When I showed her the division patterns, she said she hadn't seen them before. And this is the DIRECTOR of the center who should be the most knowledgeable person there! The directors get only 2 weeks training in management of the centers AND the therapies. (Orton-Gillingham training takes 3 weeks which includes 1-on-1 practice with a student under the supervision of a master O-G teacher, and Lindamood-Bell instructors get 3 weeks of training on LMB instructional procedures.)
I would only use these centers as a last resort. If you are able to find an Orton-Gillingham tutor or are able to afford a Lindamood-Bell center (I worked at one in 2000), I think these would be a better option.
Saturday, July 03, 2004 at 10:06 PM in Learning Disabilities | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/889931
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Product: "Dyslexia Institutes of America":
Comments
To the author of this post I would encourage you to re-evaluate your recommendation based on the real facts related to DIA and its program. I have addressed all of you issues and incorrect facts in detail below. In the future I would ask that you perform more diligent research prior to making positive or negative recommendations. Please fell free to contact me directly if you have any additional questions.
Sincerely, Les Fredette,
President of DIA in Glastonbury, Connecticut
(www.diaread.com).
A. DIA is NOT like BrightStar in any way. The BrightStar program uses unproven and controversial techniques for the treatment of “reading” disorders, including dyslexia. DIA uses a program based on the time tested Orton-Gillingham approach and tightly couples it with a comprehensive diagnosis and additional therapies that target a dyslexic’s deficits in visual memory, auditory memory, sequential memory, eye tracking, visual perception, and visual motor integration. Currently ALL DIA clinics are actually independently owned and operated centers that license Dr. Jett’s program. In any event, the fact that Dr. Jett has made a commitment to providing a clear, open, affordable solution to people that suffer from dyslexia is something that should be commended. You have no idea who Dr. Jett is and what is in her heart. I can tell you that she is a wonderful and religious person who is looking to help dyslexics and has chosen to help by providing a quality service.
B. Non-proprietary tests. This is completely false. DIA uses 13 standardized tests from third party sources for their diagnosis, including tests such as Woodcock and Kauffman reading tests, and CTOPP phonemic awareness tests. There is nothing proprietary about our diagnosis tests.
C. Therapy vs. tutoring. DIA provides a clinical forum for the application of its program. We only use certified professionals (teachers, OT or SLP) trained in the DIA program. Our systematic tracking and documentation of clients provides consistency, quality control, and 100% openness to client progress on a weekly basis. All therapy is done in the clinic where therapists are monitored by the Director. Because all therapy is done in the clinic therapists always have access to clarification of their questions and receive additional instruction if needed and in real-time. In addition, therapists are re-certified twice per year. The 2-hours of therapy / week of in clinic therapy IS 2-hours of therapy. Materials are prepared prior to therapists arriving to work with their clients, and since our documentation process is very precise the therapists know exactly where they left off and how to proceed.
D. Home-therapy. Dyslexics need to work on their skills daily in order to retain what they have learned. Home-therapy is the only economical way to ensure that this happens. Certainly if a parent wishes to have this therapy provided in the clinic they would be accommodated – but this never happens because it is generally impossible due to the cost and logistics.
E. Cognitive Therapy in first 48-hours: DIA does not let clients fall behind in the first 48 hours. This is completely wrong and misunderstood. From day one DIA starts providing its sight word and phonics program. In the first 6 months DIA spends additional time addressing cognitive deficits because these are the core capabilities that keep them from learning to read. Dyslexia is the RESULT of cognitive deficits – to ignore them is simply ridiculous. The fact that we address MORE of these deficits (because we identify them in the assessment) or that we address these issues more directly than other programs is a PLUS, not a MINUS.
F. No Study? An independent statistical analysis of Dr. Jett’s program by Dr. Ory form the University of Illinois is, and has always been, available on Dr. Jett’s website. Go to www.dyslexiainstitutes.com.
G. Boder system abandon? This is simply not the case as there are current standardized dyslexia tests available that still utilize this classification system. It is ridiculous to assume that there is no value to provide a more definitive breakdown of dyslexia characteristics. In the “dark ages” we only spoke about “Cancer”, certainly we have come a long way in understanding that medical condition. Dyslexia is no different. Dyseidesia denotes specific difficulty with sight word recognition (i.e., word fluency through subconscious recognition) vs. Dysphonsesia which denotes difficulty with phonemic awareness and application of phonetic rules. Both types denote dyslexia and affect reading/spelling fluency, but for different reasons. Many dyslexics suffer from both conditions, but not all. These classifications are not arbitrary as they are tied to specific deficits and they are useful for the parents (or adult clients) to better understand the identified condition. This is no different than many other classification systems used to describe other medical disorders. While some may not choose to use such classifications, we have found that our clients find it reassuring to know that we understand the condition better than simply saying their “dyslexic”. In the end our therapy plan for a client depends upon the assessment results, not on any classification of dyslexia that we use. Therefore, I would submit to you that A) the Boder system is a valid classification mechanism; B) it certainly is not harmful in any way to utilize it; and C) its use does not in any way reflect on the quality of our program.
Another reason we choose to use the Boder system is because it also assists us in breaking the “dyslexia isn’t a real thing barrier”. Despite the fact that the IDA / Orton Society has been in existence for decades, dyslexia is still completely misunderstood not just by the general public, but by professionals and educators alike. While the IDA is a great resource for people who already know that they or their child have dyslexia, it is not a well known resource for people that have a child that has a reading issue and has not been told about dyslexia by their school or doctor. Therefore, we are spending our valuable dollars and time education people who have not been diagnosed with dyslexia - about dyslexia. This requires us to use terminology that expands beyond the “gee, someone is dyslexic only if they reverse their letters” environment that we live in today. Using the Boder system assists DIA in making people understand that “dyslexia” is not just a word, but a specific condition.
H. With regards to not having to have specialization in dyslexia to own a clinic, this is true. HELLO? THIS FOR THE BUSINESS OWNER, not the staff and/or director. And yes, Dr. Jett has put together a procedure that allows DIA to provide its services at an affordable price while maintaining the highest level of quality. This is called THINKING-OUT-OF-THE-BOX. Yes, it’s new and different with regards to dyslexia, but hardly revolutionary. When you have your blood drawn, does the person that draws your blood do the diagnosis? When you have your x-rays taken, who does the diagnosis? The fact that DIA uses its home office to provide the formal diagnosis and creation of the therapy plan is a PLUS. It is a PLUS because it provides consistency and validity. Dyslexia is not determined by a simple test, but rather a careful consideration and correlation of multiple test results. Who is more expert in evaluating a diagnosis for dyslexia – a single person who does a few every year, or a cohesive group that evaluates 100s per year. Also, this process is not done in a void – but with consultation with local diagnosticians that provide non-imperial input to the evaluation.
I. By the way, your reviewer is Linda Starr, whom we have had several recent conversations with regarding her review which was based on inaccurate information, such as the information in the post on this site.
Posted by: Les Fredette | August 5, 2004 09:23 AM


Recent Comments