Learning Disablities Posts Index
Posts, Categorized
Previous Posts: UK Approaches to Dyslexia, LDs
- British Dyslexia Association's Troubles -- January 10 2007
- Informative Webcasts on Dyslexia -- January 3 2007
- "Learning Disabilities" in the US and the UK --- January 7 2007
- Reading Changes the Brain -- December 14 2006
- Dyslexia Not a Learning Disability in New Zealand -- December 9 2006
- European Union to Study Dyslexia -- November 25 2006
- Stealth Dyslexia -- October 23 2006
- Dyslexia Misinformation in Scotland October 09 2006
- Rapid Automatic Naming and Reading Disorders August 25 2006
- Autism in Scotland May 28 2006
- Unscientific Approaches to Remediating LD in the UK March 28 2006
- Four Approaches to Remediation That Don't Work January 2006
- Remediation for Dyslexia That Is Effective January 03 2006
- Helping Weak Readers: Research to 2004 January 1 2006
- Self Concept and the Dyslexic Child December 31 2005
- UK: Burden of Dyslexia; Lack of Rigor in Remediation Appproaches September 24 2005
- Differentials in Rates of Autism Diagnosis in Scotland August 19 2004
- James Panton: Accomodation & Victimhood Instead of Remediation in the UK August 5 2004
- Evaluations of Reading Interventions in UK January 14 2004
- The "Sunflower Method" for Supporting Dyslexics January 2004
- DDAT (Dore) Bunk or Not? January 2004
The Myth of Dyslexia Posts
Interview with Julian Elliot and Michael Shaunnessey September 5 2005
Is Dyslexia A Myth? Julian Elliot and Conference Details September 2 2005
Variation in Remediating Reading Difficulties the US
- Utah a "Black Hole" for Dyslexics October 25 2006
- Dyslexia in Montana: Paucity of Resources October 22 2006
- More on Dyslexia in Alabama -- July 13 2006
- A Great Program in Wisconsin July 11 2006
- State by State Listing of Private Schools Educating LD Students -- July 11 2006
- Testing for Dyslexia July 5 2006
- LDs: Overdiagnosed? Underdiagnosed? June 17 2006
- Virginia: Problems in Special Education June 16 2006
- Mississippi: Steps To Early Identification of Students With Reading Challenges June 16 2006
- Preventing Learning Disabilities / Early Remediation June 16 2006
- Dyslexia School Scandal in Florida June 14 2006
- Massachussetts: Special Ed Is Broken June 7 2006
- Variation in SpEd Diagnosis: Through the Lens of SAT Accomodations June 2 2006
- California: One School District Fails at Special Education May 28 2006
- Colorado: Dyslexia Approached Differently in Two Districts May 5 2006
- New York/New Jersey: Series on LDs, Depression, and Autism May 2006
- New Hampshire: Special Education April 17 2006
- Variation in Special Education Approaches in Different States April 12 2006
- West Virginia: Litigation over Special Ed Failure April 6 2006
- Variation in SpEd Diagnosis: SAT Accomodations April 5 2006
- Massachussetts: SpEd Scandal April 2 2006
- Variation in SpEd Diagnosis: More on SAT Accomodations March 30 2006
- Variation in SpEd Diagnosis: SAT Accomodations Denied March 30 2006
- New Hampshire: Charter School for LD Students March 17 2006
- Colorado: Dyslexia Variation March 17 2006
- Ohio: Dyslexia Is Still Wait and See March 2006
- California: Attack on Special Education as a Luxury February 22 2006
- National: Reading Failure Prevention Act of 2004 -- January 6 2006
- Texas: Dyslexia in Texas Series by Jennifer Radcliffe January 5 2006
- Illinois: Grants For Dyslexic Services December 27 2005
- Texas: Private School Remediates Dyslexics December 5 2005
- Florida: Charter Schools Remediates Dyslexics December 3 2005
- Indiana: District Fails To Teach Dyslexic Student to Read December 2005
- Texas: What Untrreated Dyslexia Costs the State September 25 2005
- Hawai'i: Classroom Doesn't Meet Dyslexic Child's Needs But Outside Intervention Is Successful-- September 2005
- Alabama Fails Dyslexic Students Part I Part II Part III Part IV March 8 2005
- Georgia: A Private School Remediates Dyslexia November 9 2004
- National: Teachers Unsophisticated About Language, Reading November 9 2004
- Indiana: A Teacher Reflects: I Failed Dyslexic Students November 5 2004
- Indiana: Improving Schooling for Dyslexic Students October 13 2004
- New Hampshire: Masons Providing Effective Remediation August 30 2004
- Arizona: One Child's Successful Remediation September 25 2004
- Massachussetts: Colored Overlays Instead of Effective Remediation August 14 2004
- Pennsylvania: Masons Providing Effective Remediation July 7 2004
- California: IQ Testing and SpEd July 2004
- Florida: Dyslexia Research Institute June 27 2004
- Ohio: Masons Provide Effective Remediation June 2004
- Louisiana: Masons Provide Effective Remediation June 2004
- Florida: School for Dyslexics Rips Off Voucher Parents June 14 2004
General
- Success Attributes for Kids With Learning Disabilites June 12 2006
- Is ADHD Real or A Cultural Contsruct? June 6 2006
- Lindamood Bell Improves Reading June 1 2006
- Weaknesses in Teacher Preparation in Elementary Grades May 29 2006
- Eye Movements in Dyslexics May 28 2006
- Late Diagnosis of LDs In Hitherto Successful Students May 5 2006
- ADHD: Real or An Imaginary Condition? May 5 2006
- Overview of LDs April 2006
- The School Psychologist's Beliefs About LDs April 2006
- Dyscalculia Primer and Resource Guide April 15 2006
- Four High Achieving Individuals with LDs April 9 2006
- Educating the Public About LD Reality April 3 2006
- College and the LD Student March 2006
- ADHD: Overdiagnosed or Underdiagnosed? March 28 2006
- Double Deficit Hypothesis in Dyslexia Questioned March 24 2006
- Debunking the Notion that Learning Disabilities are Mythical March 2006
- Direct, Specific Instruction In Spelling Is Effective for Dyslexic Students Feburary 22 2006
- ADHD From A Teacher's Perspective February 1 2006
- Research: Adult Dyslexics Can Be Remediated December 3 2005
- Direct Instruction and LD Students December 3 2005
- Thinking Critically About Vision Therapy for Students With Learning Challenges--November 27 2005
- Teacher Education Still Isn't Rigorous On Teaching Reading November 2005
- Dyslexic Students Should Take Advantage Of Recordings for Blind & Dyslexic-- November 14 2005
- Dislecksia The Movie September 25 2005
- SpEd Problems: Kids With Minor Disabilities September 2005
- Remediation Programs That Work and Those That Don't September 2005
- The Infinite Mind: Dyslexia September 2005
- Children of the Code: Interview with Sally Shaywitz April 4 2005
- Reading Failure and Crime March 6 2005
- Adult Dyslexics: It Is Never Too Late to Remediate November 2004
- Virginia Beringer: Effective Instruction Remediates Dyslexia November 18 2004
- Elizabeth Aylsward: Effective Instruction Changes the Brain November 18 2004
- Dyslexic Does Not Mean Stupid: Changing Public Perception November 13 2004
- When and How to Screen for Dyslexia November 2004
- Intensive, Systematic Phonics Instruction Remediates Adult Dyslexics October 27 2004
- An Adult Dyslexic's Story July 6 2004
- SAT Accomodations: An Unfair Advantage? July 2004
- Understanding Psychoeducational Testing June 14 2004
- Dyslexia and Crime June 14 2004
- Red Flag Reading Screening March 19 2004
- Dyslexia: Telling Kids How Their Brains Work January 15 2004
- Brain Plasticity and Remediating Dyslexia January 2004
- Dyslexia: What To Tell Your Child January 2004
- How To Talk To Your Child's Teachers January 10 2004
- Teaching Dyslexics to Read: Approaches that Work January 2004
Product / Program Reviews
- Unscientific Approaches to Remediating LD in the UK March 28 2006
- UK: Burden of Dyslexia; Lack of Rigor in Remediation Appproaches September 24 2005
- SAT Accomodations and Alternative Treatments for Dyslexia July 2004
- Hooked on Phonics, Irlen Not Effective for Dyslexics July 2004
- Learning Breakthrough: Inexpensive, but Effectiveness? July 2004
- NSRI Dyslexia Cure with Color? No Evidence of Effectiveness July 2004
- 3D Learner Program: Expensive, No Evidence of Effectiveness July 2004
- Group Review of "Dyslexia Cure" Links July 2004
- Developmental Optometry and Dyslexia: The Problems January 15 2004
- Sound Entrainment: Not Effective For LDs January 10 2004
- DDAT (Dore) Bunk or Not? January 2004
- Neuro-Cranial Reconstruction and Dyslexia: Ineffective December 2003
- Irlen ("Scotopic Sensitivity Syndrome") Not An Effective Treatment for Dyslexia December 2003
=======
One shouldn't regard a dyslexia program as "tutoring". Parents should select a program that has been shown to work, that has the following features:
Effective Teaching to Remediate Dyslexia--These steps must be mastered in order!
- Phonemic Awareness is the first step. You must teach the student how to listen to a single word or syllable and break it into individual phonemes--the individual sounds.
- Phoneme/Grapheme Correspondence is the next step. Here you teach which sounds are represented by which letter(s), and how to blend those letters into single-syllable words.
- The Six Types of Syllables that compose English words are taught next.
- Probabilities and Rules are then taught. The English language provides several ways to spell the same sounds. For example, the sound /SHUN/ can be spelled either TION, SION, or CION. The sound of /J/ at the end of a word can be spelled GE or DGE. Dyslexic students need to be taught these rules and probabilities.
- Roots and Affixes and Morphology are then taught to expand a student's vocabulary and ability to comprehend (and spell) unfamiliar words. For instance, once a student has been taught that the Latin root TRACT means pull, and a student knows the various Latin affixes, the student can figure out that retract means pull again, contract means pull together, subtract means pull away (or pull under), while tractor means a machine that pulls.
How it is taught: Simultaneous Multisensory Instruction: Sometimes we rattle this off and don't really explain what it means or why it is important
This can be confusing to parents
Sight or seeing, using the eyes = VISUAL
Hearing or listening, using the ears = AUDITORY
Feeling or touching, using the skin = TACTILE
Moving through space and time, using the whole body = KINESTHETIC
Reading and writing go together; writing is a kinesthetic task--(can you feel how all the muscles in your hand and arm work to form letters as you write a sentence?).
Dyslexic people who use all of their senses when they learn (visual, auditory, tactile, and kinesthetic) are better able to store and retrieve the information. So a beginning dyslexic student might see the letter A, say its name and sound, and write it in the air -- all at the same time.
Excellent instruction includes:
- Intense Instruction with Ample Practice: The dyslexic brain benefits from overlearning--having a very precise focus with lots and lots of correct practice.
- Direct, Explicit Instruction: dyslexic students do not automatically "get" anything about the reading task, and may not generalize well. Therefore, each detail of every rule that governs written language needs to be taught directly, one rule at a time. Then the rule needs to be practiced until the student has demonstrated that she has mastered the rule in both receptive (reading) and productive (writing and spelling) aspects. Only then should the instructor introduce the next rule.
- Systematic and Cumulative Many dyslexic students are not identified until later in their academic careers. They have developed mental "structures" of how English works that are completely wrong. To develop good written language skills--reading and writing--the tutor must go back to the very beginning and rebuild the student's mastery with a solid foundation that has no holes or cracks.
- Synthetic and Analytic: dyslexic students must be taught both how to take the individual letters or sounds and put them together to form a word (synthetic), as well as how to look at a long word and break it into smaller pieces (analytic). Both synthetic and analytic phonics must be taught all the time.
- Diagnostic Teaching the teacher must continuously assess their student's understanding of, and ability to apply, the rules. The teacher must ensure the student isn't simply recognizing a pattern and blindly applying it. And when confusion of a previously-taught rule is discovered, it must be retaught.
What I wished every parent (and teacher) knew about dyslexia and teaching reading.
- Dyslexia is a spectrum disorder
- Dyslexia affects more than reading
- Dyslexia needs to be addressed before the child fails (instead of waiting for failure, as the law now reads)
- Dyslexia can and should be screened for as early as kindergarten
- Dyslexia can be ameliorated with specific teaching methods
- Most teachers do not understand the fundamentals of language, because they are not taught in schools of education
- Most teachers do not understand the fundamentals of teaching reading, because they are not taught in the schools of education
- Eye exercises, balance exercises, motion-sickness medication, and tinted lenses or overlays are a waste of time and money
- It is in the child's best interest to get a private psychoeducational evaluation, rather than relying upon the school district.
- It is better to be too aggressive in treating dyslexia rather than taking a wait-and-see attitude.
More resources
from the National Right to Read Foundation
What is Developmentally Appropriate?
Treatment intervention research has shown that appropriate early direct instruction seems to be the best medicine for reading problems. Reading is not developmental or natural, but is learned. Reading disabilities reflect a persistent deficit, rather than a developmental lag in linguistic (phonological) skills and basic reading skills. Children who fall behind at an early age (K and grade 1) fall further and further behind over time. Longitudinal studies show that of the children who are diagnosed as reading disabled in third grade, 74% remain disabled in ninth grade.... These findings contradict the prevalent notion that children will begin to learn to read when they are "ready."The concept "developmentally appropriate" should not suggest delaying intervention, but using appropriate instructional strategies at an early age—especially in kindergarten. Although we now have the ability to identify children who are at-risk for reading failure, and we now understand some of the instructional conditions that must be considered for teaching, the majority of reading disabilities are not identified until the third grade.
Early Identification and Treatment
The best predictor in K or 1st grade of a future reading disability in grade 3 is a combination of performance on measures of phonemic awareness, rapid naming of letters, numbers, and objects, and print awareness. Phonemic awareness is the ability to segment words and syllables into constituent sound units, or phonemes. Converging evidence from all the research centers show that deficits in phonemic awareness reflect the core deficit in reading disabilities. These deficits are characterized by difficulties in segmenting syllables and words into constituent sound units called phonemes—in short, there is a difficulty in turning spelling into sounds. Lack of phonemic awareness seems to be a major obstacle for learning to read. This is true for any language, even Chinese. About 2 in 5 children have some level of difficulty with phonemic awareness. For about 1 in 5 children phonemic awareness does not develop or improve over time. These children never catch up but fall further and further behind in reading and in all academic subjectsExamples of phonemic awareness tasks
- Phoneme deletion: What word would be left if the /k/ sound were taken away from cat?
- * Word to word matching: Do pen and pipe begin with the same sound?
- * Blending: What word would we have if you put these sounds together: /s/, /a/, /t/?
- * Sound isolation: What is the first sound in rose?
- * Phoneme segmentation: What sounds do you hear in the word hot?
- * Phoneme counting: How many sounds do you hear in the word cake?
- * Deleting phonemes: What sound do you hear in meat that is missing in eat?
- Odd word out: What word starts with a different sound: bag, nine, beach, bike? *
- Sound to word matching: Is there a /k/ in bike?
What should be in a psychoeducational evaluation?
Margaret Kay has written an article, Preparation of a Psycho-educational Evaluation Report, that all parents should read. Writing first in the Perspectives (published by The International Dyslexia Association.), and reprinted in the invaluable Wrightslaw, Marianne S. Meyer tells parents What to Expect From an Evaluation
A good evaluation for a leaning disability is not as simple as "having your child tested". First, it requires preparation on your part. You must choose an appropriate professional, provide a clear statement of your (or a teacher's) concerns, and produce records for review. You should be prepared to give a thorough and accurate prenatal, birth, motor, and medical background as well as details about speech/language development, social development, and family history. Finally, you or one or more of the child's teachers may be asked to complete checklists that will profile your child's attentional style. Supplying this information will determine the nature and scope of the evaluation. The process is methodical, and cannot be rushed! So plan ahead, allowing time to collect the necessary information and schedule appointments.
Initially, the term "Matthew Effect" was coined to describe the phenomenon of general decline on tests that measure accumulated verbal learning in children with unremediated reading disabilities. Children who cannot read to learn new information suffer from a lack of exposure to content and their verbal IQ test scores often fall over time. Children with limited reading skills are often placed in low groups in regular education classes, which leads to further educational deprivation. In many cases, the Verbal IQ scores of these children go down over time, rather than remaining stable, as is typically found in the general population.


Comments