Skeptics' Circle 114 is Up at Homologous Legs

On the Tendency of Skeptics to form Circles; and on the Perpetuation of Circles and Skeptics by Natural Means of Selection (Skeptics' Circle 114) | Homologous Legs.

It is clear to any naturalist involved in the field of skeptical study that there are more thoughts in a skeptic’s mind at any one point than can ever be written about, with the aid of a blog or not, as evidenced by the apparent ability for a skeptic to write about two completely different topics: perpetual motion and Cap-and-Trade. As such, only a few of the topics that a skeptic wants to write about ever will be. Hence, there is a clear bias in the reproductive nature of writing about science and critical thinking. But what determines which topics are chosen? And how is the medium of the writing affected by this bias?