My Photo
Buy Your Copy Now!
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 12/2003

« Some Vignettes from the Week | Main | Justin Warfield, 18, Suspected Alcohol Poisoning Heroin Overdose »

Saturday, October 20, 2007



I can't believe I missed that, Dumbledore being gay! But guys can love guys and not be gay, and I'm so naive that I don't think sexual orientation when I think love.

But maybe the bigger issue is that he couldn't be out (or did I miss something) because maybe even at Hogwarts he'd never have made headmaster.


Don't know the series, but I can just hear the outrage from the Fundamentalist community. Another reason to consider Harry Potter to be the work of the Devil!

I'm with therapydoc: love doesn't necessarily mean sexual attraction, but then I am a bit of a freak in not thinking on these things using my testicles.


I've read your post over a few times now and I'm not sure how you're connecting JK Rowling's revelation that Dumbldeore was gay and his family relationships.

Liz D.

What I said to Therapydoc & Joel:

The older I get (I'm 55 now) the more I realize how many ways there are to be parental. Or generative. Or erotic.

In the Harry Potter Universe, we meet Dumbledore well into late adulthood -- had he had children, he would most likely have been the the grand-parent class, not actively parenting.

I'm not particularly Freudian, but the concept of "sublimation" seems apropos relative to Dumbledore's career.

The comments to this entry are closed.


What I'm Tweeting

    follow me on Twitter