My Photo
Buy Your Copy Now!
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 12/2003

« Music from Space! | Main | Forget Tiny Houses, I Want to Live Here »

Monday, February 11, 2013

Comments

M.J.

On what planet do you think it is acceptable to compile and post this sort of information about a non-public person without their consent?

Do you even care that you are invading the privacy of a person with a disability?

Liz Ditz

All of the information posted above was taken from public sources, beginning with Dr.Lawrence Cranberg's obituary, posted to Dr. Cranberg's blog.The information about Mr. Crosby's schooling was taken from his posts at the blog, Age of Autism.

Reuben Gaines

"On what planet do you think it is acceptable to compile and post this sort of information about a non-public person without their consent?"

Well, he's not a non-public person. He writes publicly. He speaks publicly. He publicly confronts vaccine manufacturers, authors, and scientists. He posts private emails online.

Non-public? No. Very public.

lilady

Jake Crosby himself has provided most of his background information with his 90 blogs on Age of Autism:

http://www.ageofautism.com/jake-crosby/

"Do you even care that you are invading the privacy of a person with a disability?"

Jake's libelous blogs, his slanderous sliming posts and his stalking behaviors of respected scientists, researchers, doctors and journalists have nothing to do with his diagnosis of an ASD.

lilady

(Correction to my post above)

"Jake's libelous blogs, his slanderous sliming STATEMENTS AT PUBLIC MEETINGS and his stalking behaviors of respected scientists, researchers, doctors and journalists have nothing to do with his diagnosis of an ASD."

Science Mom

"On what planet do you think it is acceptable to compile and post this sort of information about a non-public person without their consent?

Do you even care that you are invading the privacy of a person with a disability?"

Scraping the barrel to create outrage for a pissy little public persona eh MJ? Spare us the faux indignation; it's all public information. I didn't see you register any complaint when Jake unleashed his foolish screeds against his perceived enemies with completely fallacious charges and woefully manufactured connections to all sorts of bogey-men.

Now are you saying he behaves the way he does because he has a disability? If that is so then why aren't you outraged at those who have cultivated and encouraged him? You're trying to piss on the wrong leg there MJ.

Beryl MacLachlan

Followed a link over from RI, where I always enjoy your comments. I don't know if you're going to do anything more with the Round-Up/Monsanto connection. If you do, you might want to go for multiple sources on that. The one that you used has a few elements (like a cite to Mercola.com) that trigger the skeptical spider sense. Or am I missing a bit of deliberate irony?

Liz

Irony

Beryl MacLachlan

Oh, thanks. I only have about 12 hours a day of fully functional irony detection.

Todd W.

@MJ

As others have already mentioned, all of this information is publicly available. Jake himself has provided a significant portion of the info, which Liz has conveniently cited back to his own writings. If you can point to anything specific in Liz's post which is, indeed, private information that has not been publicly published previously, please do so.

Now, if you want to be intellectually honest, you would call out Jake for publishing what really was private information (e.g., emails).

The comments to this entry are closed.

Pages

What I'm Tweeting

    follow me on Twitter